California Codes

Cal. Corporations Code § 16305 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)A partnership is liable for loss or injury caused to a person, or for a penalty incurred, as a result of a wrongful act or omission, or other actionable conduct, of a partner acting in the ordinary course of business of the partnership or with authority of the partnership.

(b)If, in the course of the partnership’s business or while acting with authority of the partnership, a partner receives or causes the partnership to receive money or property of a person not a partner, and the money or property is misapplied by a partner, the partnership is liable for the loss.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 2004–2013 · leading case: PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4776 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4776 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “Helping a client arrange bail and ensuring the payment of his firm’s fees is within the scope of a law partner’s authority. *391 A law partnership, as any partnership, is vicariously liable “for loss or injury caused to a person, or for a penalty incurred, as a result of a…”

Lathrop v. Healthcare Partners Med. Grp., 8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 668 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004). “(Corp. Code, § 16305.) 3 During closing argument, counsel for plaintiffs asserted that the written protocol was a representation to the public that every female patient of HealthCare Partners with a palpable breast mass would get a mammogram.”

Oceguera v. Cohen, 172 Cal. App. 4th 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “Grimberg did not know or should not have known the partnership was unlicensed within the meaning of section 7031, subdivision (e).”

In re: Koko Sarkis Babian (9th Cir. BAP 2013). “” Cal. Corp. Code § 16305 (a)(West 2006). 14 1 alleged partnership.”

Cravea v. Nejadpour CA2/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “(Corp. Code, §§ 16305, 16306.) In support of their motion for summary judgment, the Nejadpour defendants filed a declaration by Benjamin Donel, wherein Donel categorically denied that he had ever been a partner with F.”

Franklin v. Bakersfield Mem. Hosp. CA5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “(Corp. Code, § 16305, subd. (a); Crouse v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.