California Codes
Cal. Corporations Code § 17701.01 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This title may be cited as the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: W. Sur. Co. v. LA Cumbre Off. Partners, LLC, 8 Cal. App. 5th 125 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017).
W. Sur. Co. v. LA Cumbre Off. Partners, LLC, 8 Cal. App. 5th 125 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “Effective January 1, 2014, the Beverly-Killea Act was repealed and replaced by the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Revised Act), Corporations Code section 17701.01 et seq.”
Nidiver v. Lifehouse Health Servs. CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “house demurred to the third amended complaint, arguing that: (1) the Nidivers failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a claim for elder abuse against Lifehouse; (2) the law does not recognize a cause of action for wrongful death by a decedent’s heirs based on the…”
Gardner v. Lifehouse Health Servs. CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “13) -- years after the events at issue here (which culminated in Maxine’s death in December 2011), and the Revised Act is clear that it does not apply retroactively.”
Steele v. Trammell CA4/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “813; Corp. Code, § 17701.01 et seq. [California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act].”
Quinn v. Halachian CA2/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020). “) 2A California limited liability company is a hybrid business entity formed under the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Corp. Code, § 17701.01 et seq.) 3 located at 2306 North Eastern Avenue, Los Angeles (the Eastern Avenue property) from July 2016…”
Esagoff v. 621 Rodeo Drive CA2/8 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “We conclude the Esagoffs have stated a claim against the property owner, 621 Rodeo, but have not established that 1 A California limited liability company is a hybrid business entity formed under the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Corp. Code, §…”
Reliant Life Shares, LLC v. Cooper (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “They say that under the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Act; Corp. Code, § 17701.01 et seq.), a 26 dissolution cause of action is “a mandatory prerequisite to a buyout remedy.”
CSHV 1999 Harrison, LLC v. Cnty. of Alameda (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “5(a), 3:1(a); see also Northwest Energetic Services, at p. 852 [“In light of the growing popularity of LLC’s, the California Legislature enacted the LLC Act with the aim of expanding California's competitive business environment.”
Camden Sys. v. 409 North Camden (Cal. Ct. App. 2024). “However, the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Corp. Code, § 17701.01 et seq.; the Act),1 which governs the management and operation of limited liability companies, provides that a limited liability company generally “shall have all the powers of a…”
Meads v. Driggers (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “In 2014, it was replaced by the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (the Revised Act), Corporations Code section 17701.01 et seq.”
Holt v. Denholm CA4/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “Indeed, LLCs are a hybrid between a partnership and a corporation and are governed by the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Corp. Code, § 17701.01 et seq.). A LLC is formed upon the filing of articles of organization with the Secretary of State, and the…”
Craig v. Saddle Ranch Chop House CA2/7 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “) Former section 17060, subdivision (d), authorized the limited liability company to change the designated agent at times other than the filing of the 5 The Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company Act was repealed and replaced by the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.