California Codes

Cal. Financial Code § 4052.5 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in Sections 4053, 4054.6, and 4056, a financial institution shall not sell, share, transfer, or otherwise disclose nonpublic personal information to or with any nonaffiliated third parties without the explicit prior consent of the consumer to whom the nonpublic personal information relates.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Schmitt v. SN Servicing Corp., an Alaska Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schmitt v. SN Servicing Corp., an Alaska Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2021). · cites it 2× “13, 3 2012) (citing Cal. Fin. Code § 4052.5 ). Nor do they explain why UCL violations can be 4 predicated on another state’s law, such as Ohio Rev.”

Budowich v. Pelosi (D.D.C. 2022). “” Cal. Fin. Code § 4052.5 . Here, the violation was simple, says Budowich: JPMorgan disclosed nonpublic personal information to a third party without his explicit prior consent.”

BGC, Inc. v. Bryant (N.D. Cal. 2023). “8 Fin. Code § 4052.5—provides a private right of action.”

Thompson v. Navy Fed. Credit Union (N.D. Cal. 2024). “But there are potential privacy claims under the California Financial Information 8 Privacy Act, Cal. Fin. Code § 4052.5 . Id. Section 4052.”

Courtois v. Nationstar Mortg. CA4/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “(Fin. Code, § 4052.5.) To the extent that Courtois is relying on FIPA to support her claim that certain financial information she provided to Nationstar might be confidential, we agree.”

Nordheim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (N.D. Cal. 2025). “The Act does not contain a private right of 10 action, but there are potential privacy claims under the California Financial Information Privacy 11 Act, Cal. Fin. Code § 4052.5 . BGC, Inc. v. Bryant, No.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.