Cal. Codes » Labor Code / DIVISION 2. EMPLOYMENT REGULATION AND SUPERVISION / PART 3. PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES / CHAPTER 5. Political Affiliations
California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 1105 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the injured employee from recovering damages from his employer for injury suffered through a violation of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 503 P.3d 659 (Cal. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 503 P.3d 659 (Cal. 2022). “(Lab. Code, § 1105; see Gardenhire v. Housing Authority (2000) 85 Cal.”
Campbell v. Regents of Univ. of California, 106 P.3d 976 (Cal. 2005). “Labor Code section 1105 states, “Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the injured employee from recovering damages from his employer for injury suffered through a violation of this chapter.”
Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 3d 891 (E.D. Cal. 2017). “See Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1105 , 1102.5(f); Bloomer v.”
Taswell v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 628 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “information, or because the employer believes that the employee disclosed or may disclose information, to a government or law enforcement agency, to a person with authority over the employee or another employee who has the authority to investigate, discover, or correct the…”
Jacobson v. Schwarzenegger, 357 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (C.D. Cal. 2004). “5(b) prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee “for disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency where the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federál statute, or violation or…”
Turner v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 892 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (N.D. Cal. 2012). “6 (allocating burdens of proof in “a civil action or administrative proceeding”). Moreover, the Court notes that the Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement (“DLSE”) itself considers exhaustion under § 98.”
Malaspina (N.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2× “A plaintiff may also seek damages pursuant 6 to Cal. Labor Code § 1105 . Cal. Labor Code § 1105 (“Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the injured 7 employee from recovering damages from his employer for injury suffered through a violation of this 8 chapter.”
Taswell v. The Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (Cal. Ct. App. 2018). “e disclosed or may disclose information, to a government or law enforcement agency, to a person with authority over the employee or another employee who has the authority to investigate, discover, or correct the violation or noncompliance, or for providing information to, or…”
Mathews v. Happy Valley Conf. Ctr., Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 2019). “Citing Labor Code section 1105, the Supreme Court determined that “upon violation of [Labor Code section 1101], an employee has a right of action for damages for breach of his employment contract.”
Limon v. Cnty. of Los Angeles CA2/8 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “5th 703, 709 (Lawson); see also, Lab. Code, § 1105.) To plead a violation of section 1102.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.