California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 1182.13 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The Department of Industrial Relations shall adjust upwards the permissible meals and lodging credits by the same percentage as the increase in the minimum wage made pursuant to Section 1182.12.

(b)The Department of Industrial Relations shall amend and republish the Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders to be consistent with this section and Section 1182.12. The department shall make no other changes to the wage orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that are in existence on the effective date of this section. The department shall meet the requirements set forth in Section 1183.

(c)Every employer that is subject to an amended republished order under this section shall post a copy of the order and keep it posted in a conspicuous location frequented by employees during the hours of the workday as required by Section 1183.

(d)Wage orders that are amended and republished as required under this section shall be final and conclusive for all purposes and dispositive of all pending petitions before the Industrial Welfare Commission as of the effective date of the act adding this section. Any amendment and republication pursuant to this section shall be exempt from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and from the procedures set forth in Sections 1177, 1178.5, 1181, 1182, and 1182.1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2015 · leading case: Mendiola v. CPS Sec. Solutions, Inc., 340 P.3d 355 (Cal. 2015).
Mendiola v. CPS Sec. Solutions, Inc., 340 P.3d 355 (Cal. 2015). “3(A)(1)(a)) and “[d]ouble the . . . regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 12 hours in any workday and for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours on the seventh (7th) consecutive day of work in a workweek” (id.”
Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 730 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (2010). “00/hour, see Cal. Labor Code § 1182.13 , Plaintiffs position does not defeat jurisdiction.”
Staley v. Carlson CA1/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “8, § 11000 ; Lab. Code, § 1182.13.), and it duly awarded the maximum housing credit it could provide.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.