California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 204 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)All wages, other than those mentioned in Section 201, 201.3, 202, 204.1, or 204.2, earned by any person in any employment are due and payable twice during each calendar month, on days designated in advance by the employer as the regular paydays. Labor performed between the 1st and 15th days, inclusive, of any calendar month shall be paid for between the 16th and the 26th day of the month during which the labor was performed, and labor performed between the 16th and the last day, inclusive, of any calendar month, shall be paid for between the 1st and 10th day of the following month. However, salaries of executive, administrative, and professional employees of employers covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, as set forth pursuant to Section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended through March 1, 1969, in Part 541 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as that part now reads or may be amended to read at any time hereafter, may be paid once a month on or before the 26th day of the month during which the labor was performed if the entire month’s salaries, including the unearned portion between the date of payment and the last day of the month, are paid at that time.

(b)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, all wages earned for labor in excess of the normal work period shall be paid no later than the payday for the next regular payroll period.

(2)An employer is in compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a) of Section 226 relating to total hours worked by the employee, if hours worked in excess of the normal work period during the current pay period are itemized as corrections on the paystub for the next regular pay period. Any corrections set out in a subsequently issued paystub shall state the inclusive dates of the pay period for which the employer is correcting its initial report of hours worked.

(c)However, when employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides different pay arrangements, those arrangements shall apply to the covered employees.

(d)The requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied by the payment of wages for weekly, biweekly, or semimonthly payroll if the wages are paid not more than seven calendar days following the close of the payroll period.

(e)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) of Section 220, all wages earned by employees directly employed by the Regents of the University of California shall be paid on a regular payday. For the employees on a monthly payment schedule, payment is due no later than five days after the close of the monthly payroll period. For employees on a more frequent payment schedule, payment is due according to the pay schedule announced by the University of California in advance. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Regents of the University of California from allowing its employees to choose to distribute their pay so that they will receive paychecks throughout the year, rather than during pay periods worked only.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 285 cases (185 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 889 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2018).
Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 889 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 6× “DELTA AIR LINES SUMMARY** Certified Questions to California Supreme Court The panel certified the following questions of state law to the Supreme Court of California: (1) Do California Labor Code §§ 204 and 226 apply to wage payments and wage statements provided by an…”
Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Mem'l Hosp., 65 F. Supp. 3d 932 (C.D. Cal. 2014). · cites it 4× “; 26 (2) failure to provide overtime compensation in violation of California Labor Code §§ 204, 510, 1194, 1198; 27 (3) waiting time penalties in violation of California Labor Code § 200 et seq.”
Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 519 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). · cites it 2× “" The 2009 Notice alleged defendants had violated section 204 because they "failed to pay [plaintiff] and other aggrieved employees all wages due to them within any time period specified by California Labor Code section 204." And it alleged defendants had violated section 226,…”
Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 398 P.3d 69 (Cal. 2017). “( Lab. Code, §§ 204, 226, subd. (a).) Finally, Marshalls adopted a policy and practice of requiring Williams and other aggrieved employees to carry out company business, such as bank runs and travel for training sessions, without reimbursement.”
Bellinghausen v. Tractor Supply Co., 306 F.R.D. 245 (N.D. Cal. 2015). · cites it 2× “) Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) includes seven causes of action: 1) Failure to Provide Meal Periods (California Labor Code §§ 204, 223, 226.7, 512, and 1198); 2) Failure to Provide Rest Periods (California Labor Code §§ 204, 223, 226.”
Countrywide Fin. Corp. v. Bundy, 187 Cal. App. 4th 234 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 5× “The alleged class is, “All persons other than officers, directors or controlling persons of [plaintiffs] who were employed by [plaintiffs], were paid according to the Plan and therefore were not properly paid within the time frame set forth in California Labor Code § 204.” The…”
Walsh v. IKON Off. Solutions, Inc., 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 534 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “7), unlawfully deducted costs and expenses from wages (Lab. Code, §§ 204, 221), and failed to pay commission wages (Lab.”
Julian v. Glenair, Inc., 225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 798 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “1-2001, § 4), failure to pay timely wages (Lab. Code, § 204 ), failure to pay all wages due to former employees (Lab.”
Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1359 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “The complaint alleged Cintas violated the LWO and associated Labor Code provisions (Lab. Code, §§ 204, 227.3), engaged in an unfair and unlawful business practice (Bus.”
Hall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., 146 F. Supp. 3d 1187 (C.D. Cal. 2015). · cites it 2× “Cal. Lab. Code § 204 (a) ("Labor performed between the 1st and 15th days, inclusive, of any calendar month shall be paid for between the 16th and the 26th day of the month during which the labor was performed-, and labor performed between the 16th and the last day, inclusive, of…”
Ward v. United Airlines, Inc., 466 P.3d 309 (Cal. 2020). “(Lab. Code, § 204, subd. (c) [“However, when employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides different pay arrangements [than the prompt payment deadlines imposed in § 204], those arrangements shall apply to the covered employees”]; see Stats.”
Davis v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1191 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “Code, §§201, 202), requiring regular payment of wages (Lab. Code, § 204), and prohibiting an employer from insisting an employee execute a release of a claim before paying wages due (Lab.”
— Cal. Labor Code § 204(a) — 15 cases
Andrade v. Arby's Restaurant Grp., Inc., 225 F. Supp. 3d 1115 (N.D. Cal. 2016).
Roth v. Comerica Bank, 799 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (C.D. Cal. 2010).
— Cal. Labor Code § 204(c) — 8 cases
— Cal. Labor Code § 204(d) — 3 cases
Padilla (N.D. Cal. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.