(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b), any person who, knowing another person is a prostitute, lives or derives support or maintenance in whole or in part from the earnings or proceeds of the person’s prostitution, or from money loaned or advanced to or charged against that person by any keeper or manager or inmate of a house or other place where prostitution is practiced or allowed, or who solicits or receives compensation for soliciting for the person, is guilty of pimping, a felony, and shall be punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years.
(b)Any person who, knowing another person is a prostitute, lives or derives support or maintenance in
whole or in part from the earnings or proceeds of the person’s prostitution, or from money loaned or advanced to or charged against that person by any keeper or manager or inmate of a house or other place where prostitution is practiced or allowed, or who solicits or receives compensation for soliciting for the person, when the prostitute is a minor, is guilty of pimping a minor, a felony, and shall be punishable as follows:
(1)If the person engaged in prostitution is a minor 16 years of age or older, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years.
(2)If the person engaged in prostitution is under 16 years of age, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six, or eight years.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Edward Sullivan, 797 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 2× “5(d); (2) oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); (3) pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and (4) pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
People v. Superior Court (Hartway), 562 P.2d 1315 (Cal. 1977).
· cites it 2× “, by gentle or natural operations; to seek to induce or elicit; ... ['] (Webster's New International Dictionary (2d ed.”
People v. Leonard CA4/1, 228 Cal. App. 4th 465 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
“A jury convicted Louis Van Leonard and Charles Dwayne Walser of two counts each of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h, subd. (a)), 1 two counts each of pandering (§ 266i, subd.”
People v. M.V., 225 Cal. App. 4th 1495 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
“As a result, this individual—who admitted that he knew the minor—was taken into custody on a host of charges, including felony pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h, subd. (a)), and felony pandering involving a minor (Pen.”
People v. Maita, 157 Cal. App. 3d 309 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 3× “* Philip Joseph Maita (hereafter appellant) was found guilty after a nonjury trial of six counts of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h), seven counts of pandering (Pen.”
United States v. David Reinhart, 893 F.3d 606 (9th Cir. 2018).
“5(d); oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
People v. Kent, 96 Cal. App. 3d 130 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979).
· cites it 2× “A jury found defendant Dwayne Paul Kent guilty: (count 1) of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h) in the commission of which he personally and intentionally inflicted “great bodily injury” (Pen.”
People v. Scally CA4/3, 243 Cal. App. 4th 285 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “— The jury found defendant guilty of one count of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h, subd. (a)) and one count of pandering (Pen.”
United States v. Edward Sullivan, 753 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 2× “5(d); (2) oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); (3) pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and (4) pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
People v. Hill, 103 Cal. App. 3d 525 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 2× “[2] Penal Code section 266h provides: "Any person who, knowing another person is a prostitute, lives or derives support or maintenance in whole or in part from the earnings or proceeds of such person's prostitution, or from money loaned or advanced to or charged against such…”
People v. Main, 152 Cal. App. 3d 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Code, § 208), and pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h). Further, although appellant was sentenced to three years in the state prison, if it had been possible to commit him to CYA and the judge had followed the recommendation of the probation officer, appellant would have been sentenced…”
People v. Almodovar, 190 Cal. App. 3d 732 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Code, § 266h); procurement *743 or persuasion of a child under age 14 to engage in lewd or lascivious acts (§ 266j); employment of a minor under age 17 for modeling or a performance showing sexual conduct (§ 311.4, subd. (c)); rape by means of force or fear (§ 261, subd.”
— Cal. Penal Code § 266h(a) — 5 cases
United States v. Edward Sullivan, 797 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2015).
“5(d); (2) oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); (3) pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and (4) pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
United States v. David Reinhart, 893 F.3d 606 (9th Cir. 2018).
“5(d); oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
United States v. Edward Sullivan, 753 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2014).
“5(d); (2) oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(2); (3) pimping in violation of California Penal Code § 266h(a); and (4) pandering in violation of California Penal Code § 266i(a)(2).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.