Cal. Codes » Penal Code
California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 288.7 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Any person 18 years of age or older who engages in sexual intercourse or sodomy with a child who is 10 years of age or younger is guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 25 years to life.

(b)Any person 18 years of age or older who engages in oral copulation or sexual penetration, as defined in Section 289, with a child who is 10 years of age or younger is guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 15 years to life.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 372 cases (187 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: People v. Van Ngo, 225 Cal. App. 4th 126 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Van Ngo, 225 Cal. App. 4th 126 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “(Pen. Code, §§ 288.7, subd. (b), 288, subd.”
People v. Jimenez, 247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 221 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2019). · cites it 2× “, the first time) ( *378 Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b) ); count 8-sexual penetration of a child 10 or under (digital penetration of S.”
People v. Gonzales, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “guilty of two counts of oral copulation with a child 10 years old or younger ( Pen. Code, §§ 288.7, subd. (b), 2 289 ) (counts 1 and 3); three counts of lewd acts with a child (§ 288, subd.”
People v. Cornett, 274 P.3d 456 (Cal. 2012). “Penal Code section 288.7 makes it a felony, punishable by an indeterminate life term, for any adult to engage in specified sexual conduct “with a child who is 10 years of age or younger.”
The People v. Mestas, 217 Cal. App. 4th 1509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “(Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b); counts three and four).”
People v. Cowan, 8 Cal. App. 5th 1152 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “Cowan guilty of one count of sodomy of a person under age 10 (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (a) 1 ); two counts of oral copulation with a person under age 10 (§ 288.”
People v. Powell, 194 Cal. App. 4th 1268 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). “We find no reason to reverse the judgment and will affirm it.”
People v. ZarateCastillo, 244 Cal. App. 4th 1161 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “Defendant was ultimately charged with 11 offenses — two counts of sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or under (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b)), one count of forcible sexual penetration (Pen.”
People v. Cisneros-Ramirez, 240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 204 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “FACTS Defendant was charged with two counts of oral copulation or sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or younger ( Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b) ; all subsequent statutory references are to the Penal Code), and three counts of committing a lewd act upon a child under the…”
People v. Mendoza, 240 Cal. App. 4th 72 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “* Defendant Ildefonso Mendoza was charged with two counts of sexual intercourse or sodomy with a child 10 years old or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (a); counts 1 & 2),* 1 oral copulation or sexual penetration with a child 10 years old or younger (§ 288.”
People v. Spence, 212 Cal. App. 4th 478 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “), occurring on April 20, 2009 (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subds. (b) [count 1, sexual penetration] & (a) [count 2, sodomy]; all further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless noted).”
People v. Saavedra, 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 544 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “11, Penal Code Section 288.7(b), ... sexual penetration with a child .”
Show all 372 citing cases →
— Cal. Penal Code § 288.7(a) — 8 cases
People v. Martinez CA6 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023).
(HC) Cuevas v. Sullivan (E.D. Cal. 2020).
(HC) DeAnda v. Koenig (E.D. Cal. 2021).
Ochoa v. Clark (N.D. Cal. 2021).
Barrios v. Sullivan (S.D. Cal. 2021).
— Cal. Penal Code § 288.7(b) — 19 cases
People v. Saavedra, 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 544 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “11, Penal Code Section 288.7(b), ... sexual penetration with a child .”
People v. Saavedra (Cal. Ct. App. 2018).
Jimmy M. Garcia v. B. Cates (C.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Otero v. Diaz (E.D. Cal. 2020).
Ross v. Kernan (S.D. Cal. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.