California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 3053 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The Board of Parole Hearings upon granting any parole to any prisoner may also impose on the parole any conditions that it may deem proper.

(b)The Board of Parole Hearings may impose as a condition of parole that any prisoner granted parole undergo an examination or test for tuberculosis when the board reasonably suspects that the parolee has, has had, or has been exposed to, tuberculosis in an infectious stage.

(c)For purposes of this section, an “examination or test for tuberculosis” means testing and followup examinations or treatment according to the Centers for Disease Control and American Thoracic Society recommendations in effect at the time of the initial examination.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: D.B. v. Superior Court of Humboldt Cnty., 171 Cal. App. 4th 197 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

D.B. v. Superior Court of Humboldt Cnty., 171 Cal. App. 4th 197 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “Father suggests that treatment ordered as a condition of probation is different from treatment ordered as a condition of parole because parole conditions are imposed in the discretion of the parole authorities rather than by the court directly (Pen. Code, § 3053, subd. (a)), and…”

In Re Marks, 453 P.2d 441 (Cal. 1969). · cites it 2× “the criminal law, between conditions of parole which are mandatory in all cases (Pen. Code, §§ 3053, 3053.5) and. those which the Adult Authority “may deem proper” to impose (Pen.”

In Re Schoengarth, 425 P.2d 200 (Cal. 1967). “) The statute further empowers the Adult Authority to impose on any grant of parole “such conditions as it may deem proper" (Pen. Code, § 3053). The conditions customarily invoked, for example, govern the parolee’s residence, employment and civil rights, restrict his use of…”

People v. Knox, 95 Cal. App. 3d 420 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979). “On March 2, 1976, appellant had signed a parole agreement in which he stated: “I agree that my residence and any property under my control may be searched without a warrant at any time by any agent of the Department of Corrections or any law enforcement officer.”

McCarthy v. Superior Court, 191 Cal. App. 3d 1023 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987). “(Pen. Code, §§ 3053, 3053.5.) “These conditions may govern the location in which the parolee resides, the persons with whom he associates and lives, the places to which he may travel, his use of intoxicants, and other aspects of his life.”

In Re Corona, 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 736 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “(Pen. Code, § 3053, subd. (a).) *321 “There are, however, limits upon the parole authority’s imposition of restrictions.”

Guillory v. Contra Costa Cnty. (N.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2× “The conditions of Guillory’s parole appear lawful 9 The California Penal Code section 3053 provides that “The Board of Parole Hearings shall 10 have the power to establish and enforce rules and regulations under which inmates committed to 11 state prisons may be allowed to go…”

People v. Perrot (Cal. Ct. App. 2024). “; Pen. Code, § 3053, subd. (a)), there are constitutional limits upon the parole authority’s imposition of restrictions.”

Guillory v. Contra Costa Cnty. (N.D. Cal. 2025). “” Cal. Penal Code § 3053 ; see also Cal. Penal Code § 3052 .”

In re Monzo, 33 Cal. App. 3d 144 (Cal. Ct. App. 1973). “Penal Code section 3053 provides as follows: “The Adult Authority upon granting any parole to any prisoner may also impose on the parole such conditions as it may deem proper, and shall impose as a condition of the parole, that all or a portion of his credits earned, or to be…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.