California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 5076.2 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Any rules and regulations, including any resolutions and policy statements, promulgated by the Board of Parole Hearings, shall be promulgated and filed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, and shall, to the extent practical, be stated in language that is easily understood by the general public.

(b)The Board of Parole Hearings shall maintain, publish and make available to the general public, a compendium of its rules and regulations, including any resolutions and policy statements, promulgated pursuant to this section.

(c)The exception specified in this subdivision to the procedures specified in this section shall apply to the Board of Parole Hearings. The executive officer may specify an effective date that is any time more than 30 days after the rule or regulation is filed with the Secretary of State. However, no less than 20 days prior to that effective date, copies of the rule or regulation shall be posted in conspicuous places throughout each institution and shall be mailed to all persons or organizations who request them.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1976–2010 · leading case: In Re Stanley, 54 Cal. App. 3d 1030 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Stanley, 54 Cal. App. 3d 1030 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “1160; Pen. Code, § 5076.2.) These factors were brought to our attention only when the petition for rehearing was filed.”

Gilman v. Davis, 690 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (E.D. Cal. 2010). “The penal code provides statutory guidance for the exercise of this power, and the Board has enacted regulations further specifying the parole process, pursuant to its authority under California Penal Code § 5076.2. All prisoners whose sentences include life but do not include…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.