California Codes

Cal. Vehicle Code § 6300 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in Sections 5905, 5907, and 5908, no security interest in any vehicle registered under this code, irrespective of whether the registration was effected prior or subsequent to the creation of the security interest, is perfected until the secured party or his or her successor or assignee has deposited, either physically or by electronic transmission pursuant to Section 1801.1, with the department, at its office in Sacramento, or at any other office as may be designated by the director, a properly endorsed certificate of ownership to the vehicle subject to the security interest showing the secured party as legal owner if the vehicle is then registered under this code, or, if the vehicle is not so registered, an application in usual form for an original registration, together with an application for registration of the secured party as legal owner, and upon payment of the fees as provided in this code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–2018 · leading case: In Re Murry-Hudson, 147 B.R. 960 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1992).
In Re Murry-Hudson, 147 B.R. 960 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1992). · cites it 2× “Cal. Vehicle Code § 6300 . In accordance with Cal.”
In re: Gil Alberto De Jesus Gomez, III, 592 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2018). “Cal. Veh. Code § 6300 . Similarly, section 6301 states: "When the secured party.”
Simon v. Chrysler Credit Corp. (In Re Babaeian Transp. Co.), 206 B.R. 536 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1997). “showing the secured party as legal owner____ Cal.Veh.Code § 6300 (West 1987). Section 6301 specifies the consequences of the deposit 9 of the certificate of ownership as authorized in section 6300.”
Perry v. Chase Auto Fin. (In re Perry), 540 B.R. 710 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2015). · cites it 3× “There is no evidence that Chase deposited the *714 certificate of title — endorsed to show its security interest in the Vehicle— with the Department of Motor Vehicles, as required by Cal. Vehicle Code § 6300 et seq. to perfect Chase’s hen on the car.”
Mirolla v. Mendez, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1683 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980). “(Veh. Code, § 6300; Cal. U. Com. Code, § 9302, subd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.