green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1931 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1931
1978
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cookston v. Commissioner
See United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 (1931) ; Edwards v. Commissioner, 680 F.2d 1268 ↩ (9th Cir. 1982) . 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bagur v. Comm'r
(2×)
See United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 (1931); Hopkins v. Bacon, 282 U.S. 122 (1930); Goodell v. Koch, 282 U.S. 118 (1930); Poe v. Seaborn, supra. However, if the petitioner’s interest in the community property was a mere expectancy, she was not required to report one-half of the community income.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Merrill
(3×)
See United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 , 51 S.Ct. 184 , 75 L.Ed. 714 .
examined
Cited "see"
Somerville v. Commissioner
(3×)
See United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 , 51 S.Ct. 184 , 75 L.Ed. 714 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ali
(2×)
Ed. 731 , 50 S. Ct. 241 (1930) ; see United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 , 793-794 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shelley Jou Wienke v. Commissioner
Sec. 1.66-1(a), Income Tax Regs.; see also United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792, 794 (1931). - 14 - [*14] A State’s community property laws determine the ownership of community property income, while Federal law determines the Federal taxation of that income.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bass v. Commissioner
Compare United States v. Malcolm, supra , with United States v. Robbins, 269 U.S. 315 , 327 (1926) ; see also United States v. Mitchell, supra, at 195-196 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hampton v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also, United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 (1931).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
MALCOLM.
v.
MALCOLM.
512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1931.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 180 opinions | Published
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
[*794] Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.
Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.
PER CURIAM.
The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.