United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 (1931).
Search
United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 (1931). Book View Copy Cite
✓ Positive Treatment Followed 2 positive ▼
United States
v.
Malcolm
512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1931.
282 U.S. 792
Per Curiam.
Cited by 180 opinions  |  Published
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

[*794] Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.

Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.

PER CURIAM.

The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.