Columbia-Deschutes Power Co. v. Stricklin, State Eng'r, 290 U.S. 590 (1933). · Go Syfert
Search
Columbia-Deschutes Power Co. v. Stricklin, State Eng'r, 290 U.S. 590 (1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “wasteful application of water, even though a useful project, * * * is not included in the term ‘use’ as contemplated by the law of waters”
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hannigan v. Hinton (orctapp, 2004-09-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Hannigan v. Hinton
Or. Ct. App. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
wasteful application of water, even though a useful project, is not included in the term 'use' as contemplated by the law of waters
cited Cited "see" Vandehey v. Wheeler
Or. Ct. App. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Waters of Deschutes River, 134 Or 623 , 286 P 563 , 294 P 1049 (1930), appeal dismissed 290 US 590 (1933).
cited Cited "see" Vandehey v. Wheeler
Or. Ct. App. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Waters of Deschutes River, 134 Or. 623 , 286 P. 563 , 294 P. 1049 (1930), appeal dismissed 290 U.S. 590 , 54 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed. 520 (1933).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Columbia-Deschutes Power Company
v.
Charles E. Stricklin, as State Engineer of the State of Oregon
3.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1933.
290 U.S. 590
Mr. Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, with whom Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General, and Mr. Alfred-E. Clark. Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief, for appeL lee, in support of the motion. Mr. Arthur L.. Veazie, for appellant, in opposition thereto.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 84%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (2)
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the application for allowance of the appeal was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229,43 Stat. 936, 940; U.S. Code, Title 28, § 350).