Louis Weber v. United States, 344 U.S. 834 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
Louis Weber v. United States, 344 U.S. 834 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Labor Relations Board v. Dove Coal Company and Lark Coal Company (ca4, 1966-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Dove Coal Company and Lark Coal Company (2×)
4th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See NLRB v. Williams, 195 F.2d 669, 672 (4 Cir. 1952), cert. denied 344 U.S. 834 , 73 S.Ct. 42 , 97 L.Ed. 649 . 17 In this connection, the companies assign error to the trial examiner's refusal to receive certain testimony proffered by purchasing agent Bailey.
cited Cited "see" John Deere Company of Kansas City, a Corporation, and Deere & Company, a Corporation v. William T. Graham, and Graham Plow, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aeration Processes v. Lange, 8 Cir., 196 F.2d 981, 982 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834 , 73 S.Ct. 43 , 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. Sin Jin Products Co.
D. Maryland · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
C.Ala.1954, 131 F.Supp. 520 ; Durkin v. Waldron, D.C.La.1955, 130 F.Supp. 501 ; Mitchell v. Thompson Materials and Construction Company, Inc., D.C.Calif.1954, 27 Labor Cases, par. 68, 888; see also National Labor Relations Board v. Williams, 4 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 669 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 834 , 73 S.Ct. 42 , 97 L.Ed. 649 ; Tobin v. Maryland Beverage Company, Inc. and Southern Packing Company, Inc., D.Md.1953. 8 Total employment in excess of 40 hours per week during the period in question was established. 9 Defendants contend, however, that Gifford was employed for the fixed weekl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louis Weber
v.
United States
236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1952.
344 U.S. 834
Published

344 U.S. 834

73 S.Ct. 42

97 L.Ed. 649

Louis WEBER, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 236.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1952

Messrs. Howard W. Ameli and James F. Ryan, for petitioner.

Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Murray and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

1

Denied.

2

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

3

This is another instance where I deem it appropriate to indicate what was before us in a petition for certiorari. See State of Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 70 S.Ct. 252, 94 L.Ed. 562. One of the questions presented by this petition is the sufficiency of the claim that the verdict was vitiated because publications reflecting adversely on the defendant, before any testimony was taken in the case, precluded a fair and impartial trial. Under the circumstances the Court of Appeals, composed of SWAN, Chief Judge, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges, rejected the claim while acknowledging that 'such comments by newspapers [as revealed by the exhibits herein] during the pendency of a criminal trial are inexcusable.[2]' United States v. Weber, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 237, 239.

4

Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

2

'In England it is probable that the publishers would be severely penalized. See cases cited in [State of] Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 921-936, 70 S.Ct. 252, 94 L.Ed. 562.'