Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41 (1958). · Go Syfert
Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“... require a short and plain statement of the claim that will give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.”
58 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc. (ca11, 2001-06-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
... require a short and plain statement of the claim that will give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.
discussed Cited "see" Hill v. Goord
E.D.N.Y · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Conley v. Gibson, 356 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Harris v. City of New York, 186 F.3d 243 (2d Cir.1999); S.E.C. v. U.S. Environmental, Inc., 155 F.3d 107 , 110 (2d Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ferguson
v.
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
799.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1958.
356 U.S. 41
Jo B. Gardner for petitioner., James L. Homire and Frank C. Mann for respondent.
Whittaker.
Cited by 36 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 89%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We hold that the proofs were sufficient to submit to the jury the question whether employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512; Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Deen v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 925; Thomson v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 353 U. S. 926; Arnold v. Panhandle & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 360; Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 354 U. S. 901; McBride v. Toledo Terminal R. Co., 354 U. S. 517; Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18; Honeycutt v. Wabash R. Co., 355 U. S. 424. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Missouri is[*42] reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18.

For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Whittaker dissents.