United States Ex Rel. Poret v. Sigler, 361 U.S. 375 (1960).

United States Ex Rel. Poret v. Sigler, 361 U.S. 375 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.5 score

13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 13

Treatment by court

ca5	0R/0Y/0G	8
njsuperctappdiv	0R/0Y/0G	2
ca2	0R/0Y/0G	1
flmd	0R/0Y/0G	1
laed	0R/0Y/0G	1

Frequently cited alongside

#1	green	Moore	co-cited 6×
#2	green	Fay	co-cited 4×
#3	green	Affronti	co-cited 4×
#4	green	Michel	co-cited 4×
#5	red	Fay	co-cited 4×
#6	green	Labat	co-cited 4×
#7	neutral	Labat	co-cited 4×
#8	green	Thiel	co-cited 3×
#9	green	Brown	co-cited 3×
#10	green	Eubanks	co-cited 3×
#11	red	Swain	co-cited 3×

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

UNITED STATES Ex Rel. PORET Et Al.
v.
SIGLER, WARDEN

307, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan 25, 1960.

361 U.S. 375

80 S. Ct. 404

4 L. Ed. 2d 380

1960 U.S. LEXIS 1719

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

G. Wray Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for petitioners., Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, M. E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General, and John E. Jackson, Jr., Special Counsel to the Attorney General, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Cited by 8 opinions | Published

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for disposition of the question whether members of petitioners’ race were deliberately and intentionally limited and excluded in the selection of petit jury panels, in violation of the Federal Constitution.