green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pollion v. Lewis
(2×)
See, e. g., Larson v. Warren, 132 So.2d 177, 181 (Fla.S.Ct.1961, per curiam), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 369 U.S. 427 , 82 S.Ct. 879 , 8 L.Ed.2d 7 ; Escobedo v. State Department of Motor Vehicles, 35 Cal.2d 870 , 222 P.2d 1 (1950); Adams v. City of Pocatello, 91 Idaho 99 , 416 P.2d 46 (1966); cf. Wall v. King, 206 F.2d 878 (1st Cir. 1953); Perez v. Tynan, 307 F.Supp. 1235 (D.C.Conn. 1969); Quetawki v. Prentice, 303 F. Supp. 737 (D.C.N.M.1968); see generally, 1 Davis — on Administrative Law (Treatise), §§ 7.08-7.10 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warren
v.
Larson, State Treasurer
v.
Larson, State Treasurer
920, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1962.
369 U.S. 427
Walter Warren for appellant., Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Black, Douglas, Frankfurter, White.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.