discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robert Gonzales and Randy Hall v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive (ECF No. 19 at 4 (citing Lopez, 697 F.2d); ECF No. 18 at 4 (citing Foman, 371 U.S. 16 at 182).) 17 Second, Plaintiffs already knew all the facts necessary to allege claims against Snyder at 18 the time of filing the original Complaint.

cited Cited as authority (rule) Oster v. State of California Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 16 178, 182 (1962); see also Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 17 2003) (discussing Foman factors). 18 III.

cited Cited as authority (rule) Lull v. County of Sacramento P. 15(a)(2); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 16 178, 182 (1962).

discussed Cited as authority (rule) London Wallace v. City of Fresno “In the absence of any apparent or declared reason—such as undue delay, bad 12 faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by 13 amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of 14 the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought should, as the rules require, be 15 ‘freely given.’ ” Eminence Capital, LLC, 316 F.3d at 1052 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 16 178, 182 (1962)). 17 Here, Plaintiff seeks leave to file a third amended complaint to name two previously 18 unidentified de…