Presser v. United States, 371 U.S. 71 (1963). · Go Syfert
Presser v. United States, 371 U.S. 71 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Whitehead v. NEVADA COM'N JUDICIAL DIS. (nev, 1994-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Whitehead v. NEVADA COM'N JUDICIAL DIS.
Nev. · 1994 · confidence medium
"Under Texas law one may not be punished for contempt for violating a temporary injunction, as here, granted by a court having no jurisdiction of the subject matter." 371 U.S. at 73 , 83 S.Ct. at 179 (citations omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline
Nev. · 1994 · confidence medium
"Under Texas law one may not be punished for contempt for violating a temporary injunction, as here, granted by a court having no jurisdiction of the subject matter." 371 U.S. at 73 , 83 S.Ct. at 179 (citations omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Attorney General Opinion No.
Kan. Att'y Gen. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lanza v. Wagner , 11 N.Y.2d 317 , 183 N.E.2d 670 , 229 N.Y.S.2d 380 , 385 (citing cases), appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 74 , 9 L.Ed.2d 163 , 83 S.Ct. 177 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 901 , 9 L.Ed.2d 164 , 83 S.Ct. 205 (1962); Michaelis v. City of Long Beach, 46 A.D.2d 772 , 360 N.Y.S.2d 473 , 475 (1974) (citing Lanza v. Wagner ); see also 63A Am.Jur.2d Public Officers and Employees sec. 156, at 784-85 (1984); 67 C.J.S.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PRESSER
v.
UNITED STATES.
25.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1963.
371 U.S. 71
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

John G. Cardinal reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Edwin Knachel and Robert E. Freed.

Stephen J. Pollak reargued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.