Mamula v. United Steelworkers, 379 U.S. 17 (1964).

Mamula v. United Steelworkers, 379 U.S. 17 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.1 score

2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 2

Treatment by court

nysd		0R/0Y/0G	1
paed		0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

MAMULA
v.
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA Et Al.

327.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 19, 1964.

379 U.S. 17

85 S. Ct. 148

13 L. Ed. 2d 84

1964 U.S. LEXIS 357

57 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Harry Alan Sherman for appellant., David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar for appellees.

Brennan, Goldberg.

Cited by 2 opinions | Published

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.