Chicago & North W. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R. Co., 382 U.S. 422 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Chicago & North W. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R. Co., 382 U.S. 422 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
v.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
751.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1965.
382 U.S. 422
Published

382 U.S. 422

86 S.Ct. 616

15 L.Ed.2d 498

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.

No. 751.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

v.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.

No. 752.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson, for appellants Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. and others.

Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.

Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrz, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H. Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand, for appellees.

Jan. 24, 1966.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

2

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.