green
Positive treatment
1.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Seaboard Airline Railroad v. United States
See State of New York v. United States, 256 F.Supp. 634, 637-638 (W.D.N.Y. 1966), aff’d 386 U.S. 349 , 87 S.Ct. 1161 , 18 L.Ed.2d 98 (March 20, 1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
947.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1967.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.