Arkansas v. Tennessee, 389 U.S. 1026 (1968). · Go Syfert
Arkansas v. Tennessee, 389 U.S. 1026 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States ex rel. Sliva v. Rundle (paed, 1963-10-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States ex rel. Sliva v. Rundle
E.D. Pa. · 1963 · confidence medium
Townsend v. Sain, supra, 372 U.S. at p. 312 , 88 S.Ct. at p. 757, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 ; Sanders v. United States, supra, 373 U.S. pp. 17— 19, 83 S. Ct. pp. 1078, 1079, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 ; and Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 438 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Arkansas
v.
State of Tennessee
33, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 1026
Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Assistant Attorney General, on the motion., George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, C. Hayes Cooney, Assistant Attorney General, and Harry W. Laughlin, James L. Garthright, Jr., and J. Martin Regan, Special Counsel, for defendant.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the State of Tennessee allowed sixty days to answer.

It Is Ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.

It Is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.