green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McLAUGHLIN v. ZAVADA
See Communist Party of Ind. v. Whitcomb, 409 U.S. 1235, 1235 , 93 S.Ct. 16 , 34 L.Ed.2d 64 (1972) (noting that a mandatory injunction is an “extraordinary remedy [to] be employed only in the most unusual case.”’) As discussed below, Plaintiff has not shown that he meets the elements necessary to obtain injunctive relief.
cited
Cited "see"
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Land
See Communist Party of Ind. v. Whitcomb , 409 U.S. 1235 , 1235, 93 S.Ct. 16 , 34 L.Ed.2d 64 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana, Et Al.
v.
Communist Party of Indiana Et Al.
v.
Communist Party of Indiana Et Al.
A-370.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1972.
Communist, Douglas, Party.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
D. C. N. D. Ind. Motion of applicants for emergency stay presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied as moot. Cross motion of Communist[*807] Party of Indiana et al. to petition for mandate to enforce prior order of United States District Court also denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would treat motion of Communist Party of Indiana et al. as jurisdictional statement and postpone question of jurisdiction to hearing of case on the merits.