Diamond v. Bradley, 450 U.S. 381 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Diamond v. Bradley, 450 U.S. 381 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1984 · …the state cannot terminate parental rights by showing it is in the best interests of the children without showing the parents were unfit. ⚠ not in text
40 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re of K.A. (dc, 1984-11-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re of K.A.
D.C. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the state cannot terminate parental rights by showing it is in the best interests of the children without showing the parents were unfit.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Matter of KA
D.C. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the state cannot terminate parental rights by showing it is in the best interests of the children without showing the parents were unfit.
discussed Cited "see" Jimenez v. Department of Health & Rehabilatative Services
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See John Doe & Jane Doe v. State of Delaware, 450 U.S. 382 , 101 S.Ct. 1495 , 67 L.Ed.2d 312 (1981) (Brennan, J. dissenting to denial of review) (whether Delaware’s guidelines for determining permanent termination of the parental-child relationship are unconstitutionally vague and indefinite presents a justiciable federal question).
examined Cited "see" In re Abele (3×)
C.C.P.A. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, In re Bradley, 600 F.2d 807 , 202 USPQ 480 (Cust. & Pat.App.1979), aff’d sub nom by equally divided court, Daimond v. Bradley, 450 U.S. 381 , 101 S.Ct. 1495 , 67 L.Ed.2d 311 (1981) (Burger, C.
cited Cited "see" In Re the Welfare of C.L.L.
Minn. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doe v. Delaware, 450 U.S. 382 , 101 S.Ct. 1495 , 67 L.Ed.2d 312 (1981).
cited Cited "see" L. K. M. v. Department for Human Resources
Ky. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doe v. Delaware, 450 U.S. 382 , 101 S.Ct. 1495 , 68 L.Ed.2d 312 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
v.
BRADLEY ET AL.
79-855.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1981.
450 U.S. 381
Per Curiam.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Litvack, Harriet S. Shapiro, Robert B. Nicholson, Frederic Freilicher, Joseph F. Nakamura, and Thomas E. Lynch.

Nicholas Prasinos argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Faith F. Driscoll, Henry L. Hanson, and Ronald T. Reiling.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[*] Edward S. Irons, Mary Helen Sears, and Robert P. Beshar filed a brief for National Semiconductor Corp. as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Donald R. Dunner, Kenneth E. Kuffner, and Travis Gordon White for the American Patent Law Association, Inc.; by Reed C. Lawlor and James W. Geriak for the Los Angeles Patent Association; and by Morton C. Jacobs for Applied Data Research, Inc., et al.

William James Beard and John F. Tregoning filed a brief for Halliburton Services as amicus curiae.