Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U.S. 378 (1984). · Go Syfert
Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U.S. 378 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arizona v. Evans (scotus, 1995-03-01) · Strongest negative: Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater (scotus, 1996-01-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: but cf. · confidence bake:cell
But cf. Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U. S. 378 (1984) (post- Long decision vacating and remanding for clarification of state supreme court decision rendered without opinion). [3] The Court misdescribes my position when it states that I would limit GVR's "based on confessions of error that do not purport to concede the whole case" to "cases in which the confession of error concerns a `legal point on which the lower court explicitly relied.' " Ante, at 171 (quoting infra, at 185).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Arizona v. Evans (2×)
SCOTUS · 1995 · confidence medium
See id., at 1041, n. 6 (“There may be certain circumstances in which clarification is necessary or desirable, and we will not be foreclosed from taking the appropriate action.”); Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U. S. 378, 379 (1984) (per curiam) (post-Long decision vacating state-court judgment and remanding for such further proceedings as the state court might deem appropriate to clarify the ground of its decision).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Alabama v. Powell
SCOTUS · 2026 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U. S. 378 (1984) (per curiam).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Foster v. Chatman (3×)
SCOTUS · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U. S. 378 (1984) (per curiam); see also, e.g., Johnson v. Risk, 137 U. S. 300 , 306–307 (1890).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Ana Maria Lanza v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (4×)
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Toole, 466 U.S. 378, 378 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 378 (1984) (post- Long decision vacating state court judgment and remanding for clarification).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CAPITAL CITIES MEDIA, INC., Tdba THE WILKES-BARRE TIMES LEADER, Et Al.
v.
TOOLE, JUDGE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY
83-599.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1984.
466 U.S. 378
Per Curiam.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The proceedings below were brought to challenge an order by respondent who, in a criminal trial, barred the press and public from publishing the names and addresses of jurors. Respondent also prohibited the parties from sketching, photographing, televising, and videotaping the jurors during their service in the criminal proceedings and from handling trial exhibits without permission of the court. Petitioners filed a petition for a writ of prohibition with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. However, it was denied without opinion. Petitioners, arguing that they have been denied their federal constitutional rights, now urge us to grant certiorari.

As matters now stand, the record does not disclose whether the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania passed on petitioners’ federal claims or whether it denied their petition for a writ of prohibition on an adequate and independent state ground. For this reason, we grant the petition for writ of[*379] certiorari, vacate the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and remand the cause to that court for such further proceedings as it may deem appropriate to clarify the record. See Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Jerome, 434 U. S. 241 (1978) (per curiam); California v. Krivda, 409 U. S. 33 (1972) (per curiam).

So ordered.