Delaware v. New York, 510 U.S. 805 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Delaware v. New York, 510 U.S. 805 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roma Construction v. Arusso (ca1, 1996-10-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Roma Construction v. Arusso
1st Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
It represents "a rather thin reed upon which to base a requirement . . . neither expressed nor . . . fairly implied in the operative sections of [RICO]." Scheidler, 510 U.S. at 805.
cited Cited "see" Carpio v. Hill
S.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ylst, 510 U.S. at 805. 24 Next, the Court must determine what, if any, procedural bar was applied by the 25 state court.
cited Cited "see" State vs.Donald Middlebrooks
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Middlebrooks, 840 S.W.2d 317 (Tenn. 1992), cert. dismissed, 510 U.S. 805 , 114 S.Ct. 651 , (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delaware
v.
New York
111, Orig.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 805
Published

510 U.S. 805

Delaware et al.
v.
New York.

No. 111, Orig.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Motion of Delaware to strike the amended complaints in intervention denied. Amended complaints in intervention and answers of New York are referred to the Special Master. Counterclaims of New York are stricken without prejudice to move for leave to file such counterclaims in this Court. Should such leave be sought and responses filed with this Court, the motion and responses will be referred to the Special Master. [For earlier decision herein, see, e. g., 507 U. S. 490.]