discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Memorandum Regarding Motion to Disqualify Statement of Recusal Policy, 114 S.Ct. 52, 53 (1993). 6 The policy is based on the Justices’ construction of § 455(b)(5)(iii), and makes clear that under that provision no recusal is required where, as here, a relative’s participation in a lower court proceeding had no substan *915 tial effect on any interest held by that relative.

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Memorandum Regarding Motion to Disqualify Statement of Recusal Policy, 114 S. Ct. 52, 53 (1993).6 The policy is based on the Justices’ construction of § 455(b)(5)(iii), and makes clear that under that provision no recusal is required where, as here, a relative’s participation in a lower court proceeding had no substantial effect on any interest held by that relative.