green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Joe Long v. State of Florida
See Long v. Florida , 510 U.S. 832 , 114 S.Ct. 104 , 126 L.Ed.2d 70 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenberg v. National Geographic Society
See Dep’t of Revenue of Or. v. ACF Indus., Inc., 510 U.S. 832 , 333, 114 S.Ct. 843, 845 , 127 L.Ed.2d 165 (1994) (requiring courts to give words which are used in more than one place in a statute interpretations that are consistent).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rose
See United States v. Lindsay, 985 F.2d 666, 674 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 , 114 S.Ct. 103 , 126 L.Ed.2d 70 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Lamont Shehee v. United States
See United States v. Clark, 988 F.2d 1459, 1467 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 (1993). 11 In his second claim, Shehee alleged that the government allowed a witness to give false testimony during the hearings on his motions to enforce the plea agreement or to withdraw his plea.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elpidio G. Santos, Also Known as Indio, and Victor Alejo, Juan Garcia
See United States v. Lindsay, 985 F.2d 666, 674 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 , 114 S.Ct. 103 , 126 L.Ed.2d 70 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Handy v. State
See also United States v. Lindsay, 985 F.2d 666, 674 (2nd Cir.) (concluding “that congress considered the appropriate unit of prosecution to be the underlying drug-trafficking offense, not the separate firearms”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 , 114 S.Ct. 103 , 126 L.Ed.2d 70 (1993)(subsequent history omitted); United States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225, 1236 (6th Cir.1992) (noting that the defendant could only be convicted and sentenced for one violation of the statute), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 932 , 113 S.Ct. 1315 , 122 L.Ed.2d 702 (1993)(subsequent history omitted); United States v. Moore, 958 F.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Curtis, William G.
Cir. 1995) (en banc); see also United States v. Lindsay, 985 F.2d 666, 674-75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William G. Curtis and Jamell L. Rouson
In that line of eases, the courts focused on the imposition of multiple § 924(c)(1) convictions for each gun attributable to a defendant, even if the gun was “carried or ‘used’ in the same place and at the same time as other targeted guns.” United States v. Anderson, 59 F.3d 1323, 1328-29 (D.C.Cir.1995) (en bane); see also United States v. Lindsay, 985 F.2d 666, 674-75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 832 , 114 S.Ct. 103 , 126 L.Ed.2d 70 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lindsay
v.
United States
v.
United States
92-8626.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Lindsay
v.
United States.
No. 92-8626.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 985 F. 2d 666.