discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Silvano Salinas Since Salinas failed to contest the proceeding in any way, he is estopped from now challenging the theory under which the vehicle was forfeited 2 The panel amended its opinion in May 1995 to add that its "adoption of this categorical approach is also compelled by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch, [--- U.S. ----] 114 S.Ct. 137 [sic, should be 1937] [ 128 L.Ed.2d 767 ] (1994)." The Court's holding in Kurth Ranch, however, was not an application of a categorical approach to forfeitures, but, rather, was an adherence to the long-standing recogn…

cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. White Id. at 276, 496 N.W.2d at 83 .

cited Cited "see" State v. Corcoran See State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 277 , 496 N.W.2d 74, 83 , cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 137 (1993).

cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Donner See § 904.01, STATS.; see also State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 267 , 496 N.W.2d 74, 79 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. — , 114 S. Ct. 137 (1993).