discussed Cited "see" United States v. Edward L. Clark See United States v. Nelson, 988 F.2d 798, 810 (8th Cir.) (refusing to grant defendant minimal participant reduction simply because others in the scheme were more culpable), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 302 (1993); cf. United States v. Logan, 49 F.3d 352, 360 (8th Cir.1995) (holding defendant not entitled to minor participant reduction simply because he was less culpable than co-defendants).

cited Cited "see" Demerath Land Company, a Nebraska Corporation v. Steve Sparr Eugene Boes Farmers Cooperative Exchange, a Nebraska Cooperative Association See United States v. Nelson, 988 F.2d 798, 804 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 302 , 126 L.Ed.2d 250 (1993); Atlas Pile Driving, 886 F.2d at 992 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alejandro Cruz-Padilla, Also Known as Roberto Barriga Tinoco “We afford the district court broad discretion in controlling closing arguments, overturning the lower court only when it clearly abuses its discretion.” United States v. Cannon, 88 F.3d 1495 , 1502 (8th Cir.1996); see also United States v. Nelson, 988 F.2d 798, 807 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 914 , 114 S.Ct. 302 , 126 L.Ed:2d 250 (1993).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Michael Joseph Liskiewicz The district court correctly noted that under the Guidelines "amount of loss" is not the same as "net loss." See United States v. Prendergast, 979 F.2d 1289, 1291 (8th Cir. 1992); see also United States v. Nelson, 988 F.2d 798, 808-09 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 302 (1993); United States v. Mills, 987 F.2d 1311, 1316 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 403 (1993).