Glaze v. State, 325 S.E.2d 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Glaze v. State, 325 S.E.2d 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re B. M. H. (gactapp, 1986-01-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re B. M. H. (2×) also: Cited "see"
Ga. Ct. App. · 1986 · confidence medium
Held: “In Clarke v. Zant, 247 Ga. 194, 197 ( 275 SE2d 49 ) (1981), the court held that where a defendant proceeds to trial and represents himself the record should reflect that the trial court made the defendant aware of the danger of proceeding without counsel.” Glaze v. State, 172 Ga. App. 802, 803 ( 325 SE2d 172 ).
discussed Cited "see" Granville v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Glaze v. State, 172 Ga. App. 802 ( 325 SE2d 172 ) (1984); see also McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986) (physical precedent only).
discussed Cited "see" McCook v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Glaze v. State, 172 Ga. App. 802 ( 325 SE2d 172 ) (1984); Fernandez v. State, 171 Ga. App. 290 ( 319 SE2d 503 ) (1984); Campbell v. State, 128 Ga. App. 74 (1) ( 195 SE2d 664 ) (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glaze
v.
the State
69363.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 30, 1984.
325 S.E.2d 172
Theodore S. Worozbyt, William A. Morrison, for appellant., Herbert T. Jenkins, Jr., Solicitor, Carey M. Cameron, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.
Deen, McMurray, Sognier.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Deen, Presiding Judge.

James E. Glaze, Jr., appeals from his conviction of simple battery contending the trial court erred in allowing him to waive his right to counsel without insuring that the waiver was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Held:

The record indicates that before trial Glaze signed a form entitled “Waiver of Rights for Trial Without a Jury” and initialed the section which states: “I do not desire a lawyer appointed or employed, and waive the right to have an appointed lawyer or employed lawyer to represent me.” Just prior to trial, the court briefly examined the defendant about the waiver and merely inquired of the defendant as[*803] to whether he had read it, understood it, and if he was ready to proceed. Glaze answered all three questions in the affirmative.

Decided November 30, 1984. Theodore S. Worozbyt, William A. Morrison, for appellant. Herbert T. Jenkins, Jr., Solicitor, Carey M. Cameron, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

In Clarke v. Zant, 247 Ga. 194, 197 (275 SE2d 49) (1981), the court held that where a defendant proceeds to trial and represents himself the record should reflect that the trial court made the defendant aware of the danger of proceeding without counsel. See also Horton v. State, 161 Ga. App. 664 (289 SE2d 788) (1982) and Fernandez v. State, 171 Ga. App. 290 (319 SE2d 503) (1984). As appellant was not warned of the danger of proceeding without counsel, we must reverse.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.