green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Incorporated, T/a Warwick Books v. Prince George's County, Maryland
I. 8 While it is undoubtedly true that the government may appropriately regulate the time, place, and manner of protected speech, see City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 , 106 S.Ct. 925 , 89 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986), any regulation that places a prior restraint on the exercise of free expression carries “ ‘a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity,’ ” Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51, 57 , 85 *114 S.Ct. 734, 738, 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965) (quoting Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 , 83 S.Ct. 631, 639 , 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1963)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See Turner, 746 So.2d at 358-59 , relying on United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994), for its holding that the reliability of the RFLP procedure is subject to judicial notice and also on Perry , where the Alabama Supreme Court recognized the reliability of the theory and techniques used in RFLP testing.
cited
Cited "see"
Espinosa v. State
See United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malak Khawaja, Zafar Mian
See United States v. Newsome, 998 F.2d 1571, 1579 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 698 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fleming
See United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994) (holding that courts may now take judicial notice of the reliability of the general theory and techniques of DNA profiling); United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 799 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 834 , 113 S.Ct. 104 , 121 L.Ed.2d 63 (1992) (same). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald Pierre Beasley, United States of America v. Oliver Lawrence Beasley
See United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197 (8th Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 799-800 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 834 , 113 S.Ct. 104 , 121 L.Ed.2d 63 (1992)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994). 3 The PCR method, however, has not previously been reviewed by this Court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.
Scientific Evidence The Federal Rules of Evidence provide that expert scientific testimony is admissible pursuant to Rule 702 if the district court first concludes, pursuant to Rule 104(a), “that the expert is proposing to testify to (1) scientific knowledge that (2) will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.” Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2796 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993); accord United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1196 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Holden
See United States v. Newsome, 998 F.2d 1571, 1579 (11th Cir.1993) (ruling absent plain error argument not raised at sentencing is waived on appeal), cert. denied, - U.S. -, -, 114 S.Ct. 734 , 737, 126 L.Ed.2d 698 , 700 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Moreno-Hernandez
See United States v. Newsome, 998 F.2d 1571, 1579-80 (11th Cir.1993) (approving a 120-month term of imprisonment on a firearm possession charge, the statutory maximum for that crime, even though the sentence exceeded the guideline range for that crime alone, because the combined offense level yielded a total punishment, applicable to each count, of 292 months), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 698 (1994); United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 127-28 (4th Cir.1992) (approving imposition of the statutory maximum sentences on counts of robbery and assault, even though the se…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald J. Blandford
(2×)
See United States v. Newsome, 998 F.2d 1571, 1581 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 698 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
Nonetheless, Holden argues that the scientific evidence from these three tests failed to meet the "general acceptance" requirement of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C.Cir.1923), 11 and this court's application of Frye in United States v. Two Bulls, 918 F.2d 56, 60-61 (8th Cir.1990). 12 8 After briefing in this case, the Supreme Court decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), which held the "austere" Frye standard "should not be applied in federal trials." Id. --- U.S. at ----, 113 S.Ct. at 2794 ; see United States…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
Nonetheless, Holden argues that the scientific evidence from these three tests failed to meet the “general acceptance” requirement of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C.Cir.1923), 11 and this court’s application of Frye in United States v. Two Bulls, 918 F.2d 56, 60-61 (8th Cir.1990). 12 After briefing in this case, the SupremE Court decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., - U.S.- , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), which held the "austere" Fr-ye standard "should not be ap plied in federal trials." Id. - U.S. at 113 S.Ct. at 2794 ; see United States v. Mar…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gaines
See Beasley, 102 F.3d at 1448 (taking judicial notice of general reliability of PCR testing); see also United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191,1197 (8th Cir.1993) (taking judicial notice of general reliability of DNA testing), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994); [U.S. v.] Jakobetz, 955 F.2d [786] at 799 [(2nd Cir.1992)] (taking judicial notice of reliability of DNA testing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Timothy J. Sinskey, United States of America v. Wayne Kumm
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 56 F.3d 947, 952-53 (8th Cir.1995), and United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1198 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shea
See Beasley, 102 F.3d at 1448 (taking judicial notice of general reliability of PCR testing); see also United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197 (8th Cir.1993) (taking judicial notice of general reliability of DNA testing), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994); Jakobetz, 955 F.2d at 799 (taking judicial notice of reliability of DNA testing). (2) The PCR tests used in this case readily satisfy Rule 702’s reliability requirement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armstead v. State
Compare United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197-98 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062 , 114 S.Ct. 734 , 126 L.Ed.2d 697 (1994), with United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 800 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 834 , 113 S.Ct. 104 , 121 L.Ed.2d 63 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-6901.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1994.
Published
Richard
v.
United States.
No. 93-6901.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 9 F. 3d 102.