green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
(2×)
Nonetheless, we held the order reviewable (although it is unclear whether on the basis of some form of pendent jurisdiction or by a determination that the fee award was final under Sec. 1291), since "there would be no net judicial economy, but if anything a net diseconomy, if we held that we could not consider the merits of a fee order until the amount of fees to be awarded is fixed." Bittner, 728 F.2d at 827 ; but cf. Cooper v. Salomon Bros., Inc., 1 F.3d 82, 85 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 737 , 126 L.Ed.2d 700 (1994); Becton Dickinson & Co. v. Dist. 65, UAW, 799 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see"
Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.
See Cooper v. Salomon Bros., 1 F.3d 82, 85 (2d Cir.1993) (the policy of promoting “‘orderly judicial administration’ ” cannot “justify broadening the jurisdiction of a federal court without congressional approval”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1063 , 114 S.Ct. 737 , 126 L.Ed.2d 700 (1994); accord Pridgen, 113 F.3d at 394.
discussed
Cited "see"
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1208, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23942y Robert D. Krumme, Gordon E. Allen John Currier Nicholas Pallotta James J. Dunne Leo Fornero Gerard P. Mandry Norman K. Matheson Cochran P. Supplee and Bruce E. Moore v. Westpoint Stevens Inc., Formerly Known as West Point-Pepperell, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, C. Powers Dorsett and D. Michael Roark, Defendants-Cross-Appellees
See Cooper v. Salomon Bros., 1 F.3d 82, 85 (2d Cir.1993) (the policy of promoting " 'orderly judicial administration' " cannot "justify broadening the jurisdiction of a federal court without congressional approval"), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1063 , 114 S.Ct. 737 , 126 L.Ed.2d 700 (1994); accord Pridgen, 113 F.3d at 394 . 60 Although we are cognizant of the serious practical considerations supporting WestPoint's argument, we adhere to our prior holdings that we have no jurisdiction, under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , to review a grant of attorney's fees and costs until the amount of fees and costs have be…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cataldi
v.
Carter
v.
Carter
93-6935.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1994.
Published
Cataldi
v.
Carter et al.
No. 93-6935.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 998 F. 2d 1020.