discussed Cited "see" Robert Leslie Dunson v. United States See United States v. Dunson, No. 93-5320, 1993 WL 524291 (6th Cir. Dec. 17, 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1120 (1994). 4 Dunson then filed his present motion to vacate, presenting four grounds for relief: (1) his trial counsel (Williams) rendered ineffective assistance and had a conflict of interest, (2) his appointed counsel for the first § 2255 motion and resentencing (Bratt) rendered ineffective assistance, (3) his appellate counsel following resentencing (Waggener) rendered ineffective assistance, and (4) the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) by providing onl…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mercer v. United States See, e.g., United States v. Palmer, 3 F.3d 300, 304 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1138 , 114 S.Ct. 1120 , 127 L.Ed.2d 429 (1994) (ruling in li-mine sufficed when unclear if objection was renewed during trial); Palmerin v. City of Riverside, 794 F.2d 1409, 1413 (9th Cir.1986).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jesus Chavez v. City of Lynwood, and Keith A. Fink, Esq., Jesus Chavez v. City of Lynwood, and Javier Clift County of Los Angeles, Jesus Chavez v. City of Lynwood Javier Clift County of Los Angeles Because "the substance of [Chavez's] objection [was] thoroughly explored during the hearing on the motion in limine, and the trial court's ruling ... was explicit and definitive, no further action [was] required to preserve for appeal the issue of admissibility of that evidence." Id. ; see also United States v. Palmer, 3 F.3d 300, 304 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that "[t]he interest of justice would not be furthered by requiring ... additional objection" after unsuccessful motion in limine ), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1120 (1994). 6 We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in gra…