Hess v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 510 U.S. 1190 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Hess v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 510 U.S. 1190 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Hess (sd, 2004-05-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hess (2×)
S.D. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P.2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E.2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438 , 585 N.W.2d 865, 872 (1998) (dictum); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P.2d 176 (N.M.CtApp.), cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P.2d 818 (N.M.1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W.2d 882 (N.D.1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App.3d 490 , 659 N.E.2d 1292 (1995); State v. Ramirez, 49 WashApp. 814, 746 P.2d 344 (1987). [¶ 28.]To understand the distinction between serious and minor offenses, …
discussed Cited "see" Pineda v. City of Houston
S.D. Tex. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P.2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E.2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438, 585 N.W.2d 865, 872 (1998); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P.2d 176 (1998), cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P.2d 818 (1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W.2d 882 (N.D.1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App.3d 490 , 659 N.E.2d 1292 (1995); State v. Steelman, 16 S.W.3d 483 (Tex.App. — Eastland 2000, petition for discretionary review granted Sept. 27, 2000), State v. Ramirez, 49 Wash. Ap…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Holland
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P. 2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed. 2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E. 2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438 , 585 N.W. 2d 865, 872 (1998) (dictum); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P. 2d 176 (Ct.App.), certif. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P. 2d 818 (1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W. 2d 882 (N.D. 1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App. 3d 490 , 659 N.E. 2d 1292 (1995); State v. Ramirez, 49 Wash.App. 814 , 746 P. 2d 344 (1987).
cited Cited "see" Foote v. Spiegel
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Applewhite v. United States Air Force, 995 F.2d 997, 1000-01 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied 510 U.S. 1190 , 114 S.Ct. 1292 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Gagan v. Norton
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Applewhite v. United States Air Force, 995 F.2d 997, 1000 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1292 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Medina v. City & County of Denver, 960 F.2d 1493, 1497 (10th Cir.1992); cf. DeLancy v. Caldwell, 741 F.2d 1246, 1247 (10th Cir.1984) (holding that due process protects against a court reporter’s excessive delay in furnishing transcripts).
discussed Cited "see" Gagan v. Norton
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Applewhite v. United States Air Force, 995 F.2d 997, 1000 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1292 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Medina v. City & County of Denver, 960 F.2d 1493, 1497 (10th Cir.1992); cf. DeLancy v. Caldwell, 741 F.2d 1246, 1247 (10th Cir.1984) (holding that due process protects against a court reporter's excessive delay in furnishing transcripts). 15 We therefore REVERSE the district court's order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss on the basis of absolute immunity, and REMAND this case to the district court for a determination as to the availabili…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hess Et Al.
v.
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
93-1197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
510 U.S. 1190
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: ‘Whether Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of a bistate agency created by interstate compact, is entitled to sovereign immunity from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment?”