Truesdale v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Corr. Inst. at Graterford, 535 U.S. 935 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Truesdale v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Corr. Inst. at Graterford, 535 U.S. 935 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Studebaker v. Uribe (cacd, 2009-08-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Studebaker v. Uribe
C.D. Cal. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
In addition, it is not sufficient to show that “the instruction is undesirable, erroneous, or even ‘universally condemned.’ ” Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154 , 97 S.Ct. 1730, 1737 , 52 L.Ed.2d 203 (1977) (quoting Cupp, 414 U.S. at 146 , 94 S.Ct. at 400 ); Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974) (before habeas relief is granted due to instructional error, “it must be established not merely that the instruction is undesirable, erroneous, or even universally condemned, but that it violated some [constitutional] right”) (internal…
cited Cited "see" Riley Dobi Noel v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. Hvass, 269 F.3d 896, 898 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 1313 , 152 L.Ed.2d 222 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Roe
C.D. Cal. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murtishaw v. Woodford, 255 F.3d 926, 956 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1313 , 152 L.Ed.2d 222 (2002); Langford v. Day, 110 F.3d 1380, 1389 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 881 , 118 S.Ct. 208 , 139 L.Ed.2d 144 (1997); Bueno v. Hallahan, 988 F.2d 86, 88 (9th Cir.1993); 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Fortin
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Murtishaw v. Woodford, 255 F. 3d 926, 961 (9th Cir.2001) (application to defendant of new death penalty statute, under which jury no longer had discretion to reject death penalty even if it found that aggravating factors outweighed mitigating factors, violated ex post facto clause), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 1313 , 152 L.Ed. 2d 222 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jeanne Woodford (2×)
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Hayes must overcome the "strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance." Id.; see also Murtishaw v. Woodford, 255 F.3d 926, 939 (9th Cir.2001) (Defendant "bears the heavy burden of proving that counsel's assistance was neither reasonable nor the result of sound trial strategy."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 1313 , 152 L.Ed.2d 222 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Truesdale
v.
Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford
01-7589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
535 U.S. 935
Published

535 U.S. 935

TRUESDALE
v.
VAUGHN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, ET AL.

No. 01-7589.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 18, 2002.

1

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F. 3d 160.