Fox v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Fox v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jason Albert Becht v. United States (ca8, 2005-04-07) · Strongest negative: United States v. Williams (ca11, 2006-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Vacated United States v. Williams
11th Cir. · 2006 · confidence high
United States v. Fox, 248 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2001), vacated by 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); United States v. Mento, 231 F.3d 912 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Hilton, 167 F.3d 61 (1st Cir.1999); United States v. Acheson, 195 F.3d 645 (11th Cir.1999). .
discussed Vacated United States v. Williams
11th Cir. · 2006 · confidence high
No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (1996) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251 et seq.) 19 18 U.S.C. § 2256 (8)(B) (1996) (invalidated 2002, amended 2003) 20 18 U.S.C. § 2256 (8)(D) (1996) (invalidated 2002, amended 2003) 21 United States v. Fox, 248 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2001), vacated by 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); United States v. Mento, 231 F.3d 912 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Hilton, 167 F.3d 61 (1st Cir.1999); United States v. Acheson, 195 F.3d 645 (11th Cir. 1999). 22 Free Speech Coalition v. Reno, 198 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir.1999). 23 535 U.S. 234 , 122 S.Ct.…
discussed Cited "see" Jason Albert Becht v. United States
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mento v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); Fox v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); O’Connor v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1603 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); Tampico v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); Snow v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1603 , 152 L.Ed.2d 618 (2002); Peebles v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1603 , 152 L.Ed.2d 618 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. May (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fox, 248 F. 3d 394, 409 (5th Cir.2001), vacated on other grounds, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed. 2d 617 (2002) (upholding admission of photographs into evidence without expert testimony as to age of the young persons depicted); see also United States v. Riccardi, 258 F.Supp. 2d 1212, 1218 (D.Kan. 2003). *1120 We adopt the rationale of these federal cases, including the implicit requirement that the trial court must examine each image to be presented to the jury in order to make discrete assessments, in discharge of its gatekeeping functions, which of the images…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Tanner
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mento, 231 F.3d 912 (4th Cir.2000), vacated, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George Kelly
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mento v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014, 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002); Fox v. United States, 535 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002), on remand, 293 F.3d 237 (5th Cir.2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kelly, George
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mento, 122 S. Ct. 1602 (2002); United States v. Fox, 122 S. Ct. 1602 (2002), on remand, 293 F.3d 237 (5th Cir. 2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lindh (2×)
E.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mentó, 231 F.3d 912, 922 (4th Cir.2000), vacated on other grounds. — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Morace
4th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Likewise, we noted this congressional emphasis in United States v. Hecht when we stated that “district courts, in the course of selecting an appropriate sentence, ought to give respectful attention to Congress’ view that [child pornography crimes] are serious offenses deserving serious sanctions.” 470 F.3d 177, 182 (4th Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. Grigg, 442 F.3d 560, 564-65 (7th Cir.2006)); see also United States v. Mento, 231 F.3d 912, 915 (4th Cir.2000) (“Since 1977, Congress has attempted to eliminate child pornography.”), ce rt. granted and judgment vacated, 535 U.S. 101…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., U.S. v. Fox, 248 F.3d 394, 405 (2001), vacated on other grounds, Fox v. United States, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1602 , 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fox
v.
United States
01-805.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2002.
535 U.S. 1014
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, ante, p. 234.