discussed Cited "see" Minnesota Ex Rel. Hatch v. Hoeven Thus, the injunction DM & E seeks is within the traditional purview of Ex parte Young because it seeks “to bring the State’s regulatory scheme into compliance with federal law.” Coeur d’Alene Tribe, 521 U.S. at 289 , 117 S.Ct. 2028 , 138 L.Ed.2d 438 (O’Connor, J., concurring); see Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1053-54 (9th Cir.2001), ce rt. denied, 535 U.S. 1112 , 122 S.Ct. 2327 , 153 L.Ed.2d 159 (2002).

discussed Cited "see" DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION, — APPELLEE/CROSS v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, — APPELLANTS/CROSS Thus, the injunction DM & E seeks is within the traditional purview of Ex parte Young because it seeks “to bring the State’s regulatory scheme into compliance with federal law.” Coeur d’Alene Tribe, 521 U.S. at 289 , 117 S.Ct. 2028 (O’Connor, J., concurring); see Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1053-54 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1112 , 122 S.Ct. 2327 , 153 L.Ed.2d 159 (2002).

cited Cited "see" Sierra Club, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. See United States v. Hansen, 262 F.3d 1217, 1253-54 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1111 , 122 S.Ct. 2326 , 122 S.Ct. 2327 , 153 L.Ed.2d 158 (2002).