Bailey v. United States, 536 U.S. 961 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Bailey v. United States, 536 U.S. 961 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 7× by 5 distinct cases · “The starting point for all statutory interpretation is the language of the statute itself.”
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Papa Air LLC v. Cal-Mid Properties L P (alnd, 2020-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Papa Air LLC v. Cal-Mid Properties L P
N.D. Ala. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the starting point for all statutory interpretation is the language of the statute itself.
discussed Cited "see" Peed v. Hill
Or. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Mandanici, 205 F3d 519, 529 (2d Cir 2000), cert den, 536 US 961 (2002) (noting that “[bleginning with the rule at issue in Teague, the Court has measured at least eleven new rules, or proposed new rules, of criminal procedure against the criteria for the second exception and, in every case, has refused to apply the rule at issue retroactively”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Warner v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pickens v. State, 2001 OK CR 3, ¶ 13 , 19 P.3d 866, 874 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 961 , 122 S.Ct. 2668 , 153 L.Ed.2d 842 (2002); Valdez, 1995 OK CR 18, ¶ 33 , 900 P.2d at 374 . ¶ 56 At the time of the interview by Detective Edwards, charges had been filed against Appellant for the rape and murder of Adrianna Waller, and counsel had been appointed in that case.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Dolores Freixas
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we explained in Najjar : Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e), a district court may permit a defendant to withdraw his plea before the district court imposes sentence for “any fair and just reason.” In determining whether a defendant has shown a fair and just reason, the district court evaluates the totality of the circumstances, including “(1) whether close assistance of counsel was available; (2) whether the plea was knowing and voluntary; (3) whether judicial resources would be conserved; and (4) whether the government would be prejudiced if the defendant were allowed to withdraw his pl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bailey
v.
United States
01-5346.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2002.
536 U.S. 961
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: N.D. Alabama (1)

536 U.S. 961

BAILEY
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-5346.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 28, 2002.

1

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 Fed. Appx. 274.