Sizemore v. State, 395 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Sizemore v. State, 395 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Williams v. State (gactapp, 1991-05-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Williams v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sizemore v. State, 195 Ga. App. 548 ( 395 SE2d 669 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gary v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Smith and Eldridge, JJ, concur. 1 Wiggins v. State, 208 Ga. App. 757, 759 (3) ( 432 SE2d 113 ) (1993). 2 Jones v. State, 212 Ga. App. 676, 679 (2) ( 442 SE2d 908 ) (1994). 3 See Payne v. State, 219 Ga. App. 439 ( 465 SE2d 724 ) (1995); Evans v. State, 216 Ga. App. 21, 24 (3) ( 453 SE2d 100 ) (1995); compare McCormick v. State, 222 Ga. App. 753, 754 (1) ( 476 SE2d 271 ) (1996). 4 Louis v. State, 202 Ga. App. 681, 682 (3) ( 415 SE2d 289 ) (1992); see also Larochelle v. State, 231 Ga. App. 736, 738 (4) ( 499 SE2d 371 ) (1998). 5 Sizemore v. State, 195 Ga. App. 548 ( 395 SE2d 669 ) (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sizemore
v.
the State
A90A1120.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 8, 1990.
395 S.E.2d 669
Johnny Sizemore, pro se., John R. Parks, District Attorney, Barbara A. Becraft, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Deen, Pope, Beasley.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Johnny Sizemore, was convicted of driving with a suspended license. In this pro se appeal, Sizemore does not clearly state an enumeration of error, but he seems to contend that the evidence did not support his conviction.

The trial was not reported, and there is no transcript. In the absence of a transcript, or a record prepared from recollection or a stipulation of the case pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41 (g, i), we cannot consider enumerations of error based on the evidence. Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.