discussed Cited "see" United States v. Schaal (2×) See United States v. Ken- ney, 283 F.3d 934, 938-39 (8th Cir.) (upholding simultaneous imposi- tion of (b)(4) and (b)(5) enhancements), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 270 (2002).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. April Hedrick Schaal, A/K/A April Hendrick Schaal See United States v. Kenney, 283 F.3d 934, 938-39 (8th Cir.) (upholding simultaneous imposition of (b)(4) and (b)(5) enhancements), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 867 , 123 S.Ct. 270 , 154 L.Ed.2d 113 (2002).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Tony L. Mann (2×) See United States v. Kenney, 283 F.3d 934, 938 (8th Cir.) (observing that the Guidelines’ “expansive language indicates that the Commission intended to include enhancements for every applicable aspect of the criminal conduct”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 270 , 154 L.Ed.2d 113 (2002); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, cmt. n. 4 (“offense level adjustments” are “cumulative” unless otherwise specified).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Tony L. Mann See United States v. Kenney, 283 F.3d 934, 938 (8th Cir.) (observing that the Guidelines' "expansive language indicates that the Commission intended to include enhancements for every applicable aspect of the criminal conduct"), cert. denied, 123 S.Ct. 270 (2002); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, cmt. n.4 ("offense level adjustments" are "cumulative" unless otherwise specified).