green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Drury
See United States v. Ryan, 289 F.3d 1339, 1345 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 324 , 154 L.Ed.2d 221 (2002); see also United States v. Chirinos, 112 F.3d 1089, 1101 (11th Cir. 1997) (finding that the district court's failure to instruct did not impair the defendant's ability to defend where the court permitted defendant to elicit supporting testimony and to make closing arguments on the issue).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Drury
See United States v. Ryan, 289 F.3d 1339, 1345 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 324 , 154 L.Ed.2d 221 (2002); see also United States v. Chirinos, 112 F.3d 1089, 1101 (11th Cir.1997) (finding that the district court’s failure to instruct did not impair the defendant’s ability to defend where the court permitted defendant to elicit supporting testimony and to make closing arguments on the issue).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lindsey
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
02-5671.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
LINDSEY
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 02-5671.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.