Tush v. United States, 537 U.S. 936 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Tush v. United States, 537 U.S. 936 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“section 860 describes an offense whose pertinent elements are (a) the performance of certain acts that are prohibited by 21 u.s.c. 841 (a)(1), and (b) the proximity of those acts to a school”
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Spiridigliozzi v. United States (ca6, 2004-11-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Spiridigliozzi v. United States
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
section 860 describes an offense whose pertinent elements are (a) the performance of certain acts that are prohibited by 21 u.s.c. 841 (a)(1), and (b) the proximity of those acts to a school
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thomas
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Flaharty, 295 F.3d 182, 191 (2d Cir.) (“murder generally is not a crime of dishonesty, and nothing about the Evans murder suggested that it would in any way reflect on [the murderer-witness]’s truthfulness”), cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 936 , 123 S.Ct. 37 , 154 L.Ed.2d 237 (2002), and cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Blackwell
N.C. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Flaharty, 295 F.3d 182, 196 (2d Cir.) (holding that a special verdict and proper jury instructions made any Apprendi error in the indictment harmless), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 936 (2002); United States v. Trennell, 290 F.3d 881, 890 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1014 (2002); United States v. Borders, 270 F.3d 1180, 1184-85 (8th Cir. 2001) (observing that use of a special verdict contributed to Apprendi requirements being satisfied); State v. Watson, 346 N.J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Blackwell
N.C. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Flaharty, 295 F.3d 182 , 196 (2d Cir.) (holding that a special verdict and proper jury instructions made any Apprendi error in the indictment harmless), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 936 (2002); United States v. Trennell, 290 F.3d 881 , 890 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1014 (2002); United States v. Borders, 270 F.3d 1180 , 1184-85 (8th Cir. 2001) (observing that use of a special verdict contributed to Apprendi requirements being satisfied); State v. Watson, 346 N.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tush
v.
United States
02-5940.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 936
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

537 U.S. 936

TUSH
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-5940.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 287 F. 3d 1294.