Guadalupe Uriarte v. United States, 537 U.S. 939 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Guadalupe Uriarte v. United States, 537 U.S. 939 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hughes v. State (fla, 2005-04-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hughes v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 939 , 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002); see also State v. Tallard, 149 N.H. 183 , 816 A.2d 977, 981 (2003) (" Apprendi altered the procedure under which an enhanced sentence can be imposed.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mattarolo
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 988 F.2d 941, 945 (9th Cir.1993) Mattarolo’s next contention, that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 667 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that the ruling in Apprendi does not apply retroactively to initial petitions for collateral review), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 939 , 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Grayson v. Castro
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Guerrero
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.) (concluding that “the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002); United States v. Gay, 967 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir.1992) (stating the general rule that one three-judge panel of this court cannot overrule the decision of a prior panel).
discussed Cited "see" Simonton v. Pliler
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.) (holding that Apprendi does not apply retroactively on collateral review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Bouza v. United States
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.2002) (“We hold that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review----”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48 , — L.Ed.2d - (2002); Rees v. Hill, 286 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (applying same rule to second or successive petition).
cited Cited "see" Smith v. Miller-Stout
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48 , — L.Ed.2d -, 2002 WL 31027857 (2002). 1 AFFIRMED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Andre Swinton (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 670 (9th Cir.2002) ("Sending the drug quantity determination to the jury cannot be fundamental to the fairness of the proceeding if the judge is allowed to make such findings in some circumstances."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 939 , 123 S.Ct. 48 , 154 L.Ed.2d 243 (2002); United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.) (noting that Apprendi is "clearly not on the same level as a truly landmark decision such as Gideon [v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)]."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 3…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Swinton
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 670 (9th Cir.) (“Sending the drug quantity determination to the jury cannot be fundamental to the fairness of the proceeding if the judge is allowed to make such findings in some circumstances.”), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 48 (2002); United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.) (noting that Apprendi is “clearly not on the same level as a truly landmark decision such as Gideon [v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)].”), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 388 (2002); McCoy, 266 F.3d at 1258 (holding Apprendi does not satisfy sec…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guadalupe Uriarte
v.
United States
02-6071.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 939
Published

537 U.S. 939

GUADALUPE URIARTE
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-6071.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 35 Fed. Appx. 631.