discussed Cited "see" Caucus v. Alabama See DeJulio v. Georgia, 290 F.3d 1291 , 1295 (11th Cir.) (holding that, with respect to Georgia’s Local Delegations, Hadley’s requirement that officials be “elected” is “clearly satisfied” because, “[w]hen public officials become members of [the delegations] simply by virtue of their popular election to the legislature, they are deemed popularly elected [to the delegations] for the purposes of the one person, one vote requirement”) (punctuation and citation omitted), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 413 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).

cited Cited "see" James Miller v. Larry Norris See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1023-25 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).

examined Cited "see" Douglas Thomas v. Shawn Woolum, Richard Kepler Charlotte Starcher Billie Waddell, Sr. (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g." See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Townes v. Paule Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.A Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…