green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 15×
30.2 score
G Cite
cited 11× by 11 distinct cases, 2019–2025 ·
…he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2019–2020 ·
…he plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kidwell III v. Lee
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Copez v. Drozda
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nivens v. Tehum Care Services, Inc.
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Battle v. Yutzy
he .. . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mills v. Iser
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roberts v. Sires
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jackson v. Watts
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roberts v. Yaider
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Henderson
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clark v. Montgomery County Police Department
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ervin v. Corizon Health
he plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mathis v. Hague
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Harvey v. Maryland Parole & Probation
he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lewis v. Lau
he plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Greene v. Ms. Law Library Coordinator
he plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.
cited
Cited "see"
Black, Terrance Deering
See Wiley v. State, 10 74 S.W.3d 399, 406 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002), cert. denied, Wiley v. Texas, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 415 , 154 L.Ed.2d 294 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodford v. Ngo
(2×)
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F. 3d 1022, 1025 (CA7) (“To exhaust remedies, a prisoner must file complaints and appeals in the place, and at the time, the prison’s administrative rules require”), cert. denied, 537 U. S. 949 (2002); Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F. 3d 1181 , 1185–1186 (CA10 2004) (same); Spruill v. Gillis, 372 F. 3d 218, 230 (CA3 2004) (same); Johnson v. Meadows, 418 F. 3d 1152, 1159 (CA11 2005) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
James Miller v. Larry Norris
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1023-25 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).
examined
Cited "see"
Douglas Thomas v. Shawn Woolum, Richard Kepler Charlotte Starcher Billie Waddell, Sr.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Townes v. Paule
Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.A
Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wiley
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
02-230.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (15)
WILEY
v.
TEXAS.
No. 02-230.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 15, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
2
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 74 S. W. 3d 399.