green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Burgin
Almendarez-Torres applies to this [different occasions] aspect of the recidivism inquiry, which merely involves a determination of which prior convictions will be considered.” Id. at 1012.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chamberlain v. Pliler
See, e.g., United States v. Morris, 293 F.3d 1010, 1012 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 987 , 123 S.Ct. 428 , 154 L.Ed.2d 354 (2002); United States v. Kempis-Bonola, 287 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir.)(rejecting same argument made by petitioner here— i.e., that the determination of whether a prior conviction is “aggravated” requires the finding of facts beyond the mere fact of conviction and therefore falls outside the Apprendi recidivism exception), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 914 , 123 S.Ct. 295 , 154 L.Ed.2d 196 (2002); United States v. Santiago, 268 F.3d 151, 156 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florentino
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-6478.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 2002.
Published
FLORENTINO
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-6478.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 21, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 45 Fed. Appx. 878.