green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Honken
Even if Honken could show that the court abused its discretion in admitting or conditionally admitting this evidence pursuant to the “forfeiture by wrongdoing” exception, see United States v. Gray, 405 F.3d 227, 243 (4th Cir.2005) (deciding whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting hearsay testimony pursuant to the Rule 804(b)(6) “forfeiture by wrongdoing” hearsay exception, and finding that the trial court did not, where there was sufficient evidence to warrant application of the rule); but see United States v. Thompson, 286 F.3d 950, 961 (7th Cir.2002) (reviewing the…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard, United States of America v. Tony Skannell, Also Known as Tomcat, United States of America v. Barry Renfold Cooley, United States of America v. Roy G. Straughan, Also Known as George Clark, Also Known as C-Note (3), Also Known as C-Nutt (3)
See United States v. Hill, 589 F.2d 1344, 1352 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct. 2843 , 61 L.Ed.2d 287 (1979). 37 "A bill of particulars serves to inform the defendant of the nature of the charge against him with sufficient precision to enable him to prepare for trial, [and] to avoid or minimize the danger of surprise at trial." United States v. Hernandez, 299 F.3d 984 , 989-990 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1134 , 123 S.Ct. 918 , 154 L.Ed.2d 825 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Edwards
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Thompson, 286 F.3d 950, 965 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1134 (2003); United States v. Cherry, 217 F.3d 811, 820 (10th Cir. 2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. Sdoulam
See United States v. Hernandez, 299 F-3d 984, 991 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1134 , 123 S.Ct. 918 , 154 L.Ed.2d 825 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fulton
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-7599.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
Published
FULTON
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 02-7599.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 13, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 38 Fed. Appx. 564.