green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Blaze
But cf. United States v. Corrado, 304 F.3d 593, 597-98, 614-15 (6th Cir.2002) (enhancing defendant’s offense level for racketeering and extortion convictions, because defendant made threat to further extortion, where jury had also convicted defendant of using firearm under § 924(c), but without addressing whether this might amount to impermissible double counting), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 , 123 S.Ct. 1366 , 155 L.Ed.2d 207 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Olibio N. Topete v. United States
See United States v. Robinson, 301 F.3d 923, 925 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 , 123 S.Ct. 1367 , 155 L.Ed.2d 207 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mayes
See United States v. Hopkins, 310 F.3d 145, 150-51 (4th Cir.2002) (affirming admission of similar testimony), cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 , 123 S.Ct. 1364 , 155 L.Ed.2d 206 (2003). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Richard
See, e.g., United States v. Hopkins, 310 F.3d 145, 151 (4th Cir. 2002) (holding that defendant cannot complain of invited error where defendant requested jury instruction as matter of trial strategy and “error ... did not taint the integrity of the judicial process” (quotation omitted)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 (2003); United States v. Green, 272 F.3d 748, 754 (5th Cir. 2001) (court will not reverse on the basis of invited error “absent manifest injustice” (quotation omitted)); McNabb v. State, 887 So. 2d 929, 983 (Ala. Crim.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Armando Rodela-Aguilar v. United States
Compare United States v. Robinson, 301 F.3d 923, 925 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodela-Aguilar v. United States
Compare United, States v. Robinson, 301 F.3d 923, 925 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1238 , 123 S.Ct. 1367 , 155 L.Ed.2d 207 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
v.
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
02-8523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 2003.
Published
WILLIAMS
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES ET AL.
No. 02-8523.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 3, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 35 Fed. Appx. 97.